vialroom

#other-peptides 2026-01-23

Friday46 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • blank_run — Janoshik came back 99.4 on a SGN lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, ask me again in a month 22:29
  • monoisotopic — the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support 22:39
  • protein_floor — follow up TB-500 did nothing for me over 33 weeks and i stand by that a year later 23:10
  • blank_run — does anyone have a Janoshik result for a TFC BPC lot 23:32
VB

On this day 6 years ago this channel logged 32 messages.

PF

coming back to this anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting

[edited]

no human data

BR

Janoshik came back 99.4 on a SGN lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, ask me again in a month

10💀1👍1

BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing

BR

anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking

chromatogram-overlay.png
1240 × 720 · 473 KB · not retained in the public archive

update on the earlier thing the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 5 months and never came back

if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it, ill dig out the number

VB

Archive lookup: seven_five_sweet first appears in this channel on 2025-06-29.

PF

i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included

PF

cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4 degrees

anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something

SF

ran TB-500 alone for 17 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened

EE

GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
came back after 15 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted

is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this

i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back

people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this

oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same

PF

my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time

anyone reconstituted a 5 vial of these to 5 and had it stay clear

follow up TB-500 did nothing for me over 33 weeks and i stand by that a year later

💀15👀8📈1

slightly off topic but how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically

EE

ok so reconstituted 30 in 1ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with

follow up the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult

🧪10

placebo maybe

BR

tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling

no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past

does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s

changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting

BR

does anyone have a Janoshik result for a TFC BPC lot

👍8❤️6🤝9

ran GHK-Cu for 25 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind

one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks

🙏3❤️1
VV

i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve

👍1📈5

whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all

KF

ran one thing at a time for 2 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring