i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
#other-peptides 2026-01-17
Saturday50 messages10 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- fern_freezes — does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see 20:50
- spare_vial — if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it 22:22
- VialBot — Recon calculator: 10mg in 1ml = 4mg/ml. 22:24
- declared_value — the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult 23:35
- taper_or_not — one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks 23:37
genuine question reconstituted 30 in 0.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4.8 degrees
get it tested
🧊11
back after 18 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
❤️8
baseline month helped
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
🧊3🤝4🎉2
ran it alone
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
genuine question anyone reconstituted a 10 vial of these to 5 and had it stay clear
how do people test purity on these, does VendorInvestigate even take them
rodent data only
for the archive purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.1 on one lot and 99 on another
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 5 months and never came back
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
PeptideMeter came back 97.4 on a MKM lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
no human data
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
placebo maybe
anyone had a purity result under 98.1 on one of these
ran GHK-Cu for 27 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
🎉4⚠️2
ran TB-500 alone for 15 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened, happy to be corrected
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
did nothing for me
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
stacked, learned nothing
sceptical but curious
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
😂1📉9🙏5
Recon calculator: 10mg in 1ml = 4mg/ml.
⚠️17🧪8
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
injuries heal anyway
right so ran one thing at a time for 6 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
get it tested
⚠️17👍15👀4
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
verification channel has some
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
🧊5🔥1
ok so anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
😂11✅11💀6
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
💀15