no human data
#other-peptides 2026-01-16
Friday16 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- meal_prep_mick — BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing 22:33
- reship_rita — i stacked three things for 2 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing, for what its worth 22:44
- meal_prep_mick — no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past 22:45
- kev_measures — PeptideMeter came back 97.4 on a CPC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 23:33
- bea_reconstitutes — came back after 10 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, i have it written down somewhere 23:48
ran one thing at a time for 3 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
😂2👍2
stacked, learned nothing
injuries heal anyway
i stacked three things for 2 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing, for what its worth
🔥6
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
get it tested
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 23 months and never came back, not advice obviously
evidence is thin
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
ran it alone
one thing at a time
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
PeptideMeter came back 97.4 on a CPC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
💀10
came back after 10 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, i have it written down somewhere
🙏18