ran it alone
#other-peptides 2025-08-19
Tuesday46 messages12 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- appetite_back — is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones 19:40
- swab_dry_first — ran GHK-Cu for 27 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, someone check my working GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot… 20:38
- third_shift — secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live… 20:49
sceptical but curious
slightly off topic but anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling, ymmv
did nothing for me
😂1🔥3
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
📉4👍9
slightly off topic but PeptideMeter came back 96.8 on a QSC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
stacked, learned nothing
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
😂8🔥14
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
unrelated but ran TB-500 alone for 31 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
genuine question nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
Channel stats, last 30 days: 122 messages from 22 members.
how do people test purity on these, does Medutest even take them
does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a CPC BPC lot
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
right so does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
ran GHK-Cu for 27 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, someone check my working
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
💀9❤️4🎉5
no human data
🙏13😂10
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else, thats just me
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
⚠️12👀1
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 3.1 degrees
💀7🧊13📉6
ran one thing at a time for 2 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
🤝5
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
coming back to this anyone reconstituted a 15 vial of these to 10 and had it stay clear
👍12
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult, i could be wrong
back after 5 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
evidence is thin
🧪4🎉1✅16
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
[edited]is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
rodent data only
reconstituted 15 in 5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with, i have it written down somewhere
[edited]i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
👍1🙏2😂4
one thing at a time
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
injuries heal anyway
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically