placebo maybe
#other-peptides 2025-08-18
Monday47 messages10 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
i stacked three things for 1 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
TB-500 did nothing for me over 30 weeks and i stand by that a year later
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
🤝1💀17👍2
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
18:01tenpence pinned a message to this channel
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this, ill dig out the number
coming back to this ran one thing at a time for 6 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
lot-log.csv
724 rows · not retained in the public archive
quick one does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
slightly off topic but is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
[edited]*VendorInvestigate not the other one
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.1 on one lot and 98.6 on another
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
while im here ran TB-500 alone for 14 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
ran it alone
[edited]ran GHK-Cu for 3 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
*week 15 not week 3
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
back after 7 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
unrelated but the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
rodent data only
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
👍16
sceptical but curious
cant tell honestly
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 21 months and never came back
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
i stacked three things for 18 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
anyone reconstituted a 2 vial of these to 8 and had it stay clear
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
anyone had a purity result under 99.2 on one of these
*PeptideMeter not the other one
baseline month helped
genuine question GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
⚠️3
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway