vialroom

#other-peptides 2025-08-14

Thursday45 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • swirl_not_shake — anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back 20:44
  • plus_sixteen — changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable 21:11
  • plus_sixteen — if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it 21:19
VI

no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past

i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back, your mileage will differ

SS

follow up i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included

tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating

👀16👍9🔥3

stacked, learned nothing

SN

anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back

🎉13🧪3🔥1

baseline month helped

❤️5🧊13👍17
SS

ok so does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s

one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks

SN

GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting

SS

evidence is thin

vial-sg-1177-front.png
900 × 1200 · 271 KB · not retained in the public archive

the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them, not advice obviously

ran TB-500 alone for 30 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened

the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support

if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it

🙏6📉18

right so took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log

PS

BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing

🎉14
LU

follow up anyone reconstituted a 5 vial of these to 2 and had it stay clear

the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult

is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything

EO

reconstituted 2 in 1ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with

how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway

placebo maybe

🔥15❤️1😂9
LU

anyone had a purity result under 97.4 on one of these

CO

nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing

📈10

came back after 14 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted

VI

ran GHK-Cu for 12 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind

BS

TB-500 did nothing for me over 7 weeks and i stand by that a year later

CO

does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels

CO

the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy

DT

PeptideMeter came back 98.6 on a KP lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, from memory

BS

back after 4 months, has any actual data landed on BPC

🎉1🧊1❤️16