tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating, we shall see
#other-peptides 2025-08-13
Wednesday12 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- new_here_nat — oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same 21:35
- new_here_nat — does anyone have a PeptideMeter result for a SWB BPC lot 21:44
- month_six_me — VendorInvestigate came back 99.4 on a Homopeptide lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 21:56
came back after 18 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, still working it out
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
coa-e-2205.pdf
1 page · 497 KB · not retained in the public archive
follow up purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.4 on one lot and 99.2 on another
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
does anyone have a PeptideMeter result for a SWB BPC lot
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
follow up one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
[edited]the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
injuries heal anyway
🧊8
VendorInvestigate came back 99.4 on a Homopeptide lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
⚠️5👍10📉6
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing