how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
#other-peptides 2025-05-10
Saturday49 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- courier_vs_post — is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent 16:50
- courier_vs_post — PeptideMeter came back 98.6 on a QST lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 16:59
- courier_vs_post — does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s 18:51
- endotoxin_ed — i stacked three things for 4 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing 19:57
- endotoxin_ed — GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser 20:45
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
🧪5❤️6💀9
PeptideMeter came back 98.6 on a QST lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
😂8🙏4📈5
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
sceptical but curious
injuries heal anyway
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 20 months and never came back, ill dig out the number
ran GHK-Cu for 29 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, ill dig out the number
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
ran one thing at a time for 6 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening, i think
[edited]anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
[edited]purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.4 on one lot and 99.2 on another, take that with a pinch of salt
rodent data only
verification channel has some
get it tested
did nothing for me
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
one thing at a time
🧊1🤝5📈9
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
*that should say weekly
evidence is thin
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
🤝1❤️3✅2
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
janoshik-sg-1177.pdf
2 pages · 869 KB · not retained in the public archive
ran it alone
❤️1
sorry to jump in people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
placebo maybe
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
✅3🧪10
ran TB-500 alone for 23 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
stacked, learned nothing
baseline month helped
while im here is stacking three things at once ever defensible
TB-500 did nothing for me over 28 weeks and i stand by that a year later
✅10
while im here took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
i stacked three things for 4 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
💀8📉4🔥7
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a SSA BPC lot
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
🎉7✅12❤️14
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
reconstituted 20 in 1.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with