vialroom

#other-peptides 2025-05-09

Friday37 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • reta_resting_hr — if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it 14:09
  • marrow.mod — cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 5.6 degrees 15:59
  • food_noise_off — PeptideMeter came back 97.4 on a SGN lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 16:22
  • panel_before_after — does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s 18:10
QH

the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them

RR

coming back to this nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing, i think

RR

if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it

🙏13📉157

get it tested

follow up BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing

VI

i stacked three things for 15 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing, your mileage will differ

evidence is thin

tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating

15:40marrow.mod pinned a message
MM

cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 5.6 degrees

fridge-thermometer.png
800 × 800 · 632 KB · not retained in the public archive
🔥3❤️1🧊13
RO

ok so the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support

FN

PeptideMeter came back 97.4 on a SGN lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works

🤝4
RO

unrelated but took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log

TT

i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve

PB

came back after 4 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted

💀1

whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication

TT

ran TB-500 alone for 17 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened, we shall see
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this

tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling

how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically

QH

one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks

[edited]