#other-peptides 2025-03-27

anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting

Janoshik came back 98.6 on a SGN lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works

nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing

the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them

people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this

the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support

purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 96.8 on one lot and 98.1 on another

GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included

ran TB-500 alone for 20 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened, not advice obviously

changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable

i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back

baseline month helped

ran it alone

no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past

verification channel has some

does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s

stacked, learned nothing

one thing at a time

is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent

how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically

no human data

TB-500 did nothing for me over 23 weeks and i stand by that a year later

did nothing for me

ran one thing at a time for 5 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring

Assay note: JEEP lot F-1330 reported at 98.6% of label content.