Assay note: MKM lot G-0641 reported at 98.6% of label content.
#other-peptides 2025-03-26
Wednesday37 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- VialBot — Assay note: MKM lot G-0641 reported at 98.6% of label content. 22:36
- glow_no — does anyone have a Medutest result for a QSC BPC lot 22:48
- glow_no — VendorInvestigate came back 97.4 on a BCH lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 22:50
- VialBot — Inter-lab diff for lot G-0641: 99.4% vs 99%. Within expected range. 22:52
- bpc_sceptic — purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 96.8 on one lot and 97.4 on another 23:26
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time, ymmv
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 20 months and never came back
[edited]does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
does anyone have a Medutest result for a QSC BPC lot
VendorInvestigate came back 97.4 on a BCH lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
🔥15
Inter-lab diff for lot G-0641: 99.4% vs 99%. Within expected range.
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting, still working it out
quick one is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling, ask me again in a month
quick one no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
ran GHK-Cu for 32 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, someone check my working
one thing at a time
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them, thats one data point
ran it alone
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
slightly off topic but i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
i stacked three things for 20 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
ran TB-500 alone for 18 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
rodent data only
injuries heal anyway
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
get it tested
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 96.8 on one lot and 97.4 on another
📉6👀16
ok so nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
sceptical but curious
[edited]oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
🤝1
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
while im here how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
evidence is thin