anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
#other-peptides 2024-11-29
Friday21 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- private_script_pri — the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else, happy to be corrected 08:34
- private_script_pri — i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back 08:37
- apnoea_down_two — is stacking three things at once ever defensible 10:13
sceptical but curious
❤️7✅17📈8
stacked, learned nothing
slightly off topic but oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
get it tested
ok so cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 7.4 degrees
TB-500 did nothing for me over 9 weeks and i stand by that a year later
rodent data only
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else, happy to be corrected
📉5🎉1
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
📉17❤️11
*Janoshik not the other one
evidence is thin
👀16😂1
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable, i could be wrong
VendorInvestigate came back 96.8 on a QYB lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
🤝9💀8⚠️3
verification channel has some
transit-times.csv
457 rows · not retained in the public archive
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
ran GHK-Cu for 30 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind