is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
#other-peptides 2024-11-23
Saturday12 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- identity_shift — people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this 18:51
- identity_shift — i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve 19:25
- identity_shift — purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 96.8 on one lot and 98.1 on another 19:29
- acetate_ash — the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else, n of 1 obviously 19:37
- customs_owl — GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser 19:40
one thing at a time
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 96.8 on one lot and 98.1 on another
did nothing for me
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else, n of 1 obviously
cant tell honestly
🧪4
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
janoshik-h-2814.pdf
2 pages · 876 KB · not retained in the public archive
ran it alone