vialroom

#lab-requests 2026-06-27

Saturday35 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • logrotate — turnaround has been between 20 days and twice that depending on the queue 17:37
  • nordic_price_nils — VendorInvestigate has been the fastest for us. VendorInvestigate has been the most detailed. those are not the same lab 17:41
  • nordic_price_nils — is there a submission going out this month and can i get in on it 17:43
  • HPLC_Hank — coming back after 8 months, is the submission process the same 18:53
  • HPLC_Hank — a pooled result tells you about the pool. it does not tell you about your vial, still working it out 20:19
LO

i keep half the sample back so there is something to send if the first one goes missing

update from 14 months ago: the blinding process is unchanged and it has held up fine

a code and a lot number on the syringe in permanent marker. that is the whole labelling requirement

thats the turnaround

turnaround has been between 20 days and twice that depending on the queue

[edited]
👀1🧪11🔥6
NP

send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it

we publish the raw report. summaries hide the thing you needed to see

is there a submission going out this month and can i get in on it

🧪17🤝6📉1
LO

we have never had a lab mix up a sample. we have had members mix up their own labelling twice, from memory

LO

i would rather fund one careful quantity test than three purity tests

coming back to this do you want the vial reconstituted or as powder

add a standard

how are we splitting the cost this time

NP

the queue is posted and updated. if your code is not on it, it did not arrive, for what its worth

CC

declare it as an analytical reference sample with a low value. that is what it is

are we blinding this one or does the lab know the source

powder if you can. reconstituted travels worse and adds a variable we cannot control

coming back after 8 months, is the submission process the same

😂12👀4❤️1

send powder

we do not help with wording beyond that and the mods are strict about it

chain of custody in hobby testing is weak and we say so in every writeup, take that with a pinch of salt

CC

including a reference standard in the batch is the single best thing we ever added to this process

HH

i coordinate the round, collect the codes, and post every result including the dull ones

coordinating this round

a pooled result tells you about the pool. it does not tell you about your vial, still working it out

📈3