vialroom

#lab-requests 2025-06-11

Wednesday25 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • taper_or_not — ok so do not send your only vial. that has happened twice and both times it hurt, someone check my working 16:21
  • VialBot — Inter-lab diff for lot B-0114: 98.6% vs 99.4%. Within expected range. 16:32
  • HPLC_Hank — submissions go out blinded. the lab gets a code, not a supplier name. that removes one variable, it is not distrust, thats just me 16:39
  • HPLC_Hank — a code and a lot number on the syringe in permanent marker. that is the whole labelling requirement, still working it out 18:10
TO

ok so do not send your only vial. that has happened twice and both times it hurt, someone check my working

🔥4🧪3
VB

Inter-lab diff for lot B-0114: 98.6% vs 99.4%. Within expected range.

HH

submissions go out blinded. the lab gets a code, not a supplier name. that removes one variable, it is not distrust, thats just me

HH

anyone want to co-fund a quantity test on a lot i already own

i keep half the sample back so there is something to send if the first one goes missing

HH

turnaround has been between 12 days and twice that depending on the queue

two labs on the same lot is a luxury but it is how we learned what inter-lab variance looks like

TO

how do we stop the pool telling us about the pool instead of my vial

send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it, n of 1 obviously

*Janoshik not the other one

how many people do we need before the split is worth it

in for one

HH

a code and a lot number on the syringe in permanent marker. that is the whole labelling requirement, still working it out

whats the current turnaround, last one took 23 days

update from 15 months ago: the blinding process is unchanged and it has held up fine

HH

a pooled result tells you about the pool. it does not tell you about your vial

CO

coming back after 26 months, is the submission process the same