submissions go out blinded. the lab gets a code, not a supplier name. that removes one variable, it is not distrust
#lab-requests 2025-05-19
Monday17 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- egfr_ed — submissions go out blinded. the lab gets a code, not a supplier name. that removes one variable, it is not distrust 18:09
- luerlok — send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it 18:51
- egfr_ed — how are we splitting the cost this time roughly one sample in 2 rounds has gone missing in transit. budget for it emotionally 19:22
- split_the_cost — is there a preferred lab for quantity specifically 20:47
- impersonator_ip — what compound should we prioritise for the next round 20:50
declare it as an analytical reference sample with a low value. that is what it is
send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it
i would rather fund one careful quantity test than three purity tests
update on the earlier thing how long do you keep the retained half of the sample
how are we splitting the cost this time
roughly one sample in 2 rounds has gone missing in transit. budget for it emotionally
count me in
send powder
are we blinding this one or does the lab know the source
how much sample does the lab need for purity plus quantity
the queue is posted and updated. if your code is not on it, it did not arrive
add a standard
is there a preferred lab for quantity specifically
[edited]🔥13⚠️4
what compound should we prioritise for the next round
🙏11
we publish the raw report. summaries hide the thing you needed to see
slightly off topic but anyone want to co-fund a quantity test on a lot i already own
label the syringe