vialroom

#hplc-massspec 2026-06-28

Sunday47 messages10 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • lot_number_lou — baseline is drifting badly, is that the column or the mobile phase 17:59
  • VialBot — Testing queue: 2 submissions open, 83 awaiting dispatch. 19:53
  • LC_MS_Lena — tirzepatide is about 4813.5 Da, so 2+ is near 2407.8 and 3+ near 1605.5, still working it out 20:47
LN

baseline is drifting badly, is that the column or the mobile phase

1❤️15🎉12

plus sixteen, is that always oxidation

DE

thats co-elution

vial-h-2814-front.png
900 × 1200 · 892 KB · not retained in the public archive
KF

i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column

thats the solvent peak

DE

how do you spot a deletion in a sequence from mass alone

PS

if the lab reports area percent without stating the wavelength, the number is less useful than it looks, still working it out

ask for the trace

plus 16 is oxidation

how much sample does a lab actually need for identity as well as purity

FI

integration choices move the number by a few tenths easily. that is most of your inter-lab variance

why do two labs integrate the same peak differently

run a blank

FI

retention time is a hint, not a fingerprint. two different peptides can co-elute perfectly happily

whats a normal gradient for a peptide this size

shallow gradient

😂122
VB

Testing queue: 2 submissions open, 83 awaiting dispatch.

💀4🙏16
FI

214nm sees the amide backbone so it sees everything. 280 only sees aromatics, ymmv

update from 25 months ago: switched to asking for the chromatogram rather than the number and it changed everything

LN

the honest position is that hobby-level interpretation of a chromatogram is worth something but not much

LM

shallow gradients hide related substances behind the main peak. a steeper one separates and looks worse, honestly

tirzepatide is about 4813.5 Da, so 2+ is near 2407.8 and 3+ near 1605.5, still working it out

❤️7📈1🧊1
LN

monoisotopic and average diverge more the bigger the molecule. say which one you are quoting

*PeptideMeter not the other one

if the number you are staring at is a third of what you expected, do the charge state arithmetic before you panic

MM

thats a charge state

M      = 4113.6
[M+2H]2+ = (4113.6 + 2.02) / 2 = 2057.8
[M+3H]3+ = (4113.6 + 3.02) / 3 = 1372.2
observed 1372.3 -> consistent
🧊1🙏2⚠️8
MM

a dimer usually shows up late and at roughly double the mass. the chromatogram alone will not tell you

VB

Inter-lab diff for lot F-1330: 98.6% vs 99.4%. Within expected range.

MM

slightly off topic but is a tailing factor of anything specific a problem

VB

Reminder for madrid_mg: dose day is today. Set 4 days ago.

🧊4