vialroom

#hplc-massspec 2026-06-08

Monday35 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • vienna_vial — how would a truncation sequence show up 03:26
  • vienna_vial — plus sixteen, is that always oxidation 03:40
  • early_satiety — baseline is drifting badly, is that the column or the mobile phase if the number you are staring at is a third of what you expected, do the charge state arithmetic… 04:57
  • food_noise_off — i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer a certificate with a number and no chromatogram is asking you… 07:05
  • food_noise_off — follow up has anyone ever had a result where the mass was right and the purity was wrong nobody runs enough blanks, including me 07:08
VV

do the arithmetic

coa-h-2814.pdf
1 page · 317 KB · not retained in the public archive
❤️4💀7🔥1

how would a truncation sequence show up

🧊5

whats the void volume peak, is that always solvent

ms/ms or it isnt identity

AT

two labs a point or two apart on the same lot is normal and gets mistaken for one of them being wrong constantly

ES

baseline is drifting badly, is that the column or the mobile phase
if the number you are staring at is a third of what you expected, do the charge state arithmetic before you panic

😂2⚠️4❤️2
TT

i have a number at about a third of what i expected, is that a charge state

ES

sorry to jump in you need more sample for identity than for purity. plan for that when you post it, thats just me

is monoisotopic or average mass the one on most certificates

*Janoshik not the other one

plus 16 is oxidation

i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column

AT

retention time is a hint, not a fingerprint. two different peptides can co-elute perfectly happily

HH

sorry to jump in a warm transit can put a visible degradant peak on a chromatogram. that is what 8 days at ambient does

HH

214nm sees the amide backbone so it sees everything. 280 only sees aromatics

if the number you are staring at is a third of what you expected, do the charge state arithmetic before you panic

while im here nobody runs enough blanks, including me

FN

i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer
a certificate with a number and no chromatogram is asking you to trust the integration you cannot see

🎉11

follow up has anyone ever had a result where the mass was right and the purity was wrong
nobody runs enough blanks, including me

🧊5

is there any point running a blank if the sample is the question

FN

ms/ms sequencing is the only thing i would call identity. everything else is circumstantial

VV

if the lab reports area percent without stating the wavelength, the number is less useful than it looks

ES

deamidation is about plus 0.98 Da. it is not a rounding error, it is a degradant