vialroom

#hplc-massspec 2026-06-06

Saturday14 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • pia_plateaus — whats the void volume peak, is that always solvent 15:37
  • freeze_thaw — if the lab reports area percent without stating the wavelength, the number is less useful than it looks, we shall see monoisotopic and average diverge more the bigger… 16:39
  • hk_hplc — if the number you are staring at is a third of what you expected, do the charge state arithmetic before you panic 17:53
  • hk_hplc — if somebody says they ran a mass spec and does not show you a spectrum, that is a claim, not a result 18:06

whats the void volume peak, is that always solvent

🔥3😂7🧊1
RR

relative retention time against a standard is comparable between labs. absolute minutes are not

FT

is there any point running a blank if the sample is the question

FT

i asked Janoshik for the raw trace and they sent it. that is the right answer to that question

if the lab reports area percent without stating the wavelength, the number is less useful than it looks, we shall see
monoisotopic and average diverge more the bigger the molecule. say which one you are quoting

janoshik-a-2601.pdf
2 pages · 889 KB · not retained in the public archive
PP

truncations show as a mass deficit matching one or more residues. you need the sequence to say which, your mileage will differ

HH

if the number you are staring at is a third of what you expected, do the charge state arithmetic before you panic

📉17
HH

unrelated but a shoulder on a peak is information, and usually bad information

if somebody says they ran a mass spec and does not show you a spectrum, that is a claim, not a result

⚠️7🧊14📈14
HH

you need more sample for identity than for purity. plan for that when you post it, i have it written down somewhere

[edited]