vialroom

#cagrilintide 2026-02-13

Friday51 messages10 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • cagri_curious — is the nausea profile genuinely different or am i imagining it the fullness thing is the part people describe differently, food stops being interesting rather than… 13:49
  • otto_swirls — nobody should copy my schedule, im describing it because people asked what a slow ramp looks like 14:21
  • otto_swirls — €240 for a 20 vial and it lasts me longer than the GLP-1 does at my doses 14:36
  • cagri_curious — unrelated but did anyone find monotherapy underwhelming the fullness thing is the part people describe differently, food stops being interesting rather than repellent 14:43
  • VialBot — New independent result logged — MKM, lot H-2814, purity 98.6% (Janoshik). 16:00

monotherapy was underwhelming for me and i say that as someone who wanted it to work

cant separate them

thats the phase 3 one

14:02quiet.hours pinned a message

the nausea felt different rather than less, more fullness and less of the queasy wave, i could be wrong

[edited]
OS

nobody should copy my schedule, im describing it because people asked what a slow ramp looks like

🤝14
OS

€240 for a 20 vial and it lasts me longer than the GLP-1 does at my doses

📈17🧪5
CC

the fullness effect hasnt faded over 11 months, unlike my semaglutide appetite curve

REDEFINE is the trial

👍4⚠️2

cagrisema thats it

unrelated but did anyone find monotherapy underwhelming
the fullness thing is the part people describe differently, food stops being interesting rather than repellent

BB

added it to an existing cagrilintide dose rather than starting both, which made attribution possible

noticed something around week 9 on monotherapy, well after i had given up expecting to

REDEFINE is the phase 3 programme, most of what gets quoted casually in here is earlier work

*Medutest not the other one

BB

i keep the two on separate days so if something goes wrong i have a chance of knowing which

FM

dosing them on different days made no difference i could detect

FM

went slower because the first step gave me two rough days and i took that as information

VB

New independent result logged — MKM, lot H-2814, purity 98.6% (Janoshik).

LT

i said earlier this year that monotherapy did nothing for me, and at a higher dose it did something

NE

update on the earlier thing you cannot tell which of the two is doing what in a combination and i stopped pretending i could

LT

the fullness thing is the part people describe differently, food stops being interesting rather than repellent, from memory

LT

i titrated over twice as many weeks as i did on semaglutide and that was right for me

does amylin do something about fullness that the GLP-1 doesnt

different not less

👍7
BB

weekly for me, same day every week, no reason beyond habit
the nausea felt different rather than less, more fullness and less of the queasy wave

BB

its an amylin analogue, different receptor family, so treating it as another GLP-1 is the first mistake

17:58quiet.hours pinned a message
BB

amylin is about slowed gastric emptying and satiety signalling, thats the short version and im no pharmacologist

LT

i was sceptical about monotherapy and after 19 months im still sceptical, just less so, from memory

the reason nausea reads differently is timing, mine arrived on the second day rather than the first

the slower titration in here is community habit as much as anything, the trials had their own schedule

changed my mind on this, i started thinking amylin was the interesting bit and now i think its the pairing

stopped for 10 months and the fullness went within a fortnight of the last dose, thats one data point

the combination is the thing with trial data behind it, monotherapy in here is mostly us guessing