a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
Thread · #vendor-verification · 2026-06-30
update from 1 months ago: QYB added evidence and
Spun off from a message in #vendor-verification on 2026-06-30. 16 messages, 5 participants.
The message this came from
- wren_weighs_in — update from 1 months ago: QYB added evidence and the entry now reflects it blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs 23:04
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
not a recommendation
not a recommendation
do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
🤝6
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
revoked stays in the log
lot number or nothing
pattern not one result
refresh on evidence
⚠️14📉1
lot number or nothing
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line