vialroom

#vendor-verification 2026-06-09

Tuesday28 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • rotterdam_recon — coming back after 18 months, has the standard changed 13:38
  • VialBot — Reminder for amsterdam_aliquot: dose day is today. Set 9 days ago. 15:06
  • verify_or_dont — a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both 17:47
  • verify_or_dont — i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count 18:19
FD

blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs

TT

a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel

a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited

AA

the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line

unrelated but the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not

how does a supplier get verification revoked

VB

Reminder for amsterdam_aliquot: dose day is today. Set 9 days ago.

⚠️12👍4
PS

unrelated but how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor

if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution

CO

we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern

[edited]

refresh on evidence

CO

we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry, your mileage will differ

VO

a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both

💀4🧪1
VO

i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count

🧪7🧊13