thats evidence
#vendor-verification 2026-06-07
Sunday17 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- private_script_pri — what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine 12:16
- VialBot — Assay note: SWB lot D-0718 reported at 99.4% of label content. 14:16
- chaser_chris — a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record 14:20
follow up why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score, for what its worth
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
💀10
refresh on evidence
log it either way
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
✅6
Assay note: SWB lot D-0718 reported at 99.4% of label content.
never for sale
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
🧊1👍1🎉7
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently, for what its worth
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
*Janoshik not the other one
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
Testing queue: 3 submissions open, 24 awaiting dispatch.