log it either way
#vendor-verification 2026-06-01
Monday24 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- apob_over_ldl — a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel 16:23
- apob_over_ldl — if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution 16:43
- split_the_cost — verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently 18:24
- gorse_gains — follow up why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored 19:02
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
✅5
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
transit-times.csv
899 rows · not retained in the public archive
⚠️2
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division, from memory
follow up who decides, the mods or the room
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
blinded is better
[edited]never for sale
refresh on evidence
thin evidence
does SSA being verified mean my vial is fine
how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
site-rotation-map.png
1000 × 700 · 493 KB · not retained in the public archive
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score, your mileage will differ
post the photos
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all, thats just me
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
follow up why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
😂18⚠️2
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes, i could be wrong
how does a supplier get verification revoked
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
Recon calculator: 5mg in 0.5ml = 2.5mg/ml.
sorry to jump in we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry