vialroom

#vendor-verification 2026-05-15

Friday22 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • still_here_2024 — coming back to this a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited 04:28
  • gip_glp_gil — a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both 05:14
  • elm_escalates — verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted, still working it out 05:16
  • pbs_pip — a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record 05:36
  • elm_escalates — we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern 08:06
SH

coming back to this a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited

not a recommendation

👀1🤝12📉1
GG

a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel

GG

a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both

PP

a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record

🎉2

thats not evidence

post the photos

🤝10
TT

blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs

GG

how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing

EE

we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern

🤝2
TT

the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division

*PeptideMeter not the other one

somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log

PP

ok so two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers