Recon calculator: 15mg in 2ml = 2.5mg/ml.
#vendor-verification 2026-05-09
- VialBot — Recon calculator: 15mg in 2ml = 2.5mg/ml. 12:44
- salt_bridge — the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line 12:50
- ms_ms_mira — right so how many independent results does a supplier need verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted 14:02
- ms_ms_mira — is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable 14:06
- ms_ms_mira — a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both 14:51
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
for the archive verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently, someone check my working
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
coming back to this nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
lot number or nothing
| Evidence | Counts? |
|---|---|
| Independent report, lot you bought, lot number legible | yes |
| Independent report, no lot number | no |
| Supplier certificate only | no |
| Screenshot of a report | no |
| Blinded pooled submission | yes, for the pool |
| A friend who said it was fine | no |
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
how does a supplier get verification revoked
while im here we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises, we shall see
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record, someone check my working
post the photos
right so how many independent results does a supplier need
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
both numbers go in
[edited]a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
thin evidence