what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
#vendor-verification 2026-04-18
- assay_not_purity — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises 13:14
- factory_direct_fi — ok so does FGP being verified mean my vial is fine a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all 14:39
- blind_submit — has anyone ever offered to pay for verification 16:36
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division, from memory
On this day 6 years ago this channel logged 89 messages.
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
ok so does FGP being verified mean my vial is fine
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
how does a supplier get verification revoked
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
unrelated but what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
never for sale
coming back to this if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
coming back to this coming back after 17 months, has the standard changed
has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
revoked stays in the log
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution, ymmv
blinded is better
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
does a good result from VendorInvestigate outweigh a bad one from VendorInvestigate
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
pattern not one result