vialroom

#vendor-verification 2026-04-18

Saturday28 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • assay_not_purity — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises 13:14
  • factory_direct_fi — ok so does FGP being verified mean my vial is fine a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all 14:39
  • blind_submit — has anyone ever offered to pay for verification 16:36
AN

what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises

🙏6
EE

the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division, from memory

VB

On this day 6 years ago this channel logged 89 messages.

FD

a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel

FD

verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted

FD

ok so does FGP being verified mean my vial is fine
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all

11❤️5
ST

unrelated but what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine

a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited

ST

verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more

ST

a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record

BS

coming back to this if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score

coming back to this coming back after 17 months, has the standard changed

has anyone ever offered to pay for verification

📉4😂6
PP

if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution, ymmv

i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier

a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes

does a good result from VendorInvestigate outweigh a bad one from VendorInvestigate

we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry

📈2
BS

the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not