has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
#vendor-verification 2026-03-23
Monday60 messages11 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- retention_time — we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry 16:41
- VialBot — Verification log updated: MKM — evidence added, status unchanged. 17:07
- septum_sal — a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel 19:26
- seoul_swirl — if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score 19:42
does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
🧊1🧪16
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently, ymmv
genuine question two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
how many independent results does a supplier need
Reminder for bea_reconstitutes: dose day is today. Set 5 days ago.
Verification log updated: MKM — evidence added, status unchanged.
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
sorry to jump in does Homopeptide being verified mean my vial is fine
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
right so the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not, i think
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
🤝2
update from 15 months ago: QSC added evidence and the entry now reflects it
pattern not one result
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
ok so somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
how does a supplier get verification revoked
thats evidence
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line, thats one data point
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both, your mileage will differ
never for sale
not a recommendation
thats not evidence, for what its worth
thin evidence
post the photos
👀15🔥17
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
does a good result from Janoshik outweigh a bad one from VendorInvestigate
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
log it either way
post the photos
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
weights-monthly.csv
935 rows · not retained in the public archive
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
📈15👀15
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
📈10🎉10
blinded is better, ill dig out the number
nothing gets deleted
🙏3👀6
ok so lot number or nothing, i think
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
revoked stays in the log
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
both numbers go in
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
for the archive blinded is better
for the archive both numbers go in, happy to be corrected
revoked stays in the log
nothing gets deleted, i think
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
post the photos
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
for the archive thats evidence