both numbers go in
#vendor-verification 2026-02-14
Saturday33 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- VialBot — Assay note: GGPeps lot KP-0925 reported at 98.6% of label content. 13:23
- VialBot — On this day 3 years ago this channel logged 125 messages. 13:26
- alcohol_hits — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises nothing gets deleted from the log, including our… 14:23
follow up a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
refresh on evidence
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
thats not evidence
*that should say weekly
pattern not one result
Assay note: GGPeps lot KP-0925 reported at 98.6% of label content.
😂11🔥2
On this day 3 years ago this channel logged 125 messages.
✅9🧪15
lot number or nothing
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
genuine question if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
coming back to this verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
⚠️3🤝1🎉9
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
how many independent results does a supplier need
Testing queue: 5 submissions open, 120 awaiting dispatch.
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
🎉13⚠️1
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
while im here nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
👍9
thin evidence
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division, ymmv
genuine question the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more