vialroom

#vendor-verification 2026-02-02

Monday26 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • tyne_tracks — update from 2 months ago: FGP added evidence and the entry now reflects it, still working it out 15:39
  • VialBot — Batch lookup F-1330: 4 independent reports on file, earliest 2025-04-22. 16:18
  • vial_ledger — what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine 17:50
VL

we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern, n of 1 obviously

post the photos

for the archive if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score

TT

update from 2 months ago: FGP added evidence and the entry now reflects it, still working it out

VB

Batch lookup F-1330: 4 independent reports on file, earliest 2025-04-22.

❤️1👍2

the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now

T5

a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all

VV

while im here blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs

T5

a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel

a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record

MP

verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted

thats not evidence

VL

what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine

peptidemeter-summary-a-2418.pdf
2 pages · 184 KB · not retained in the public archive

if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution

the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division

i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count