post the photos
#vendor-verification 2025-12-31
- van_isle_vial — a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record 14:14
- taper_tess — the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now 15:27
- zed_zeroes_in — what actually counts as evidence for a verification 15:52
- taper_tess — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises 16:33
nothing gets deleted
follow up who decides, the mods or the room
*Janoshik not the other one
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
never for sale
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
[edited]verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
revoked stays in the log
why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
lot number or nothing
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs