a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
#vendor-verification 2025-12-24
Wednesday27 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
right so how many independent results does a supplier need
ok so does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything
both numbers go in
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
who decides, the mods or the room
has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
[edited]does a good result from PeptideMeter outweigh a bad one from Janoshik
not a recommendation
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
📈1
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
pattern not one result
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
does HJ being verified mean my vial is fine
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
post the photos
thats not evidence
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
🧪10👍6📉1
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
refresh on evidence
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
[edited]why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored