#vendor-verification 2025-12-05

while im here a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all

Channel stats, last 30 days: 123 messages from 45 members.

refresh on evidence

if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score

Inter-lab diff for lot F-1330: 99% vs 97.4%. Within expected range.

a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
update from 21 months ago: TFC added evidence and the entry now reflects it

what actually counts as evidence for a verification

is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation

if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution

blinded is better

log it either way

verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently

while im here we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern, we shall see

a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record