vialroom

#vendor-verification 2025-11-22

Saturday35 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • marrow.mod — what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves 09:09
  • marrow.mod — while im here a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all 09:15
  • VialBot — New independent result logged — FGP, lot A-2418, purity 97.4% (VendorInvestigate). 09:43
MM

what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves

🤝17📉4
MM

while im here a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all

[edited]
📉11🙏8💀5
VB

New independent result logged — FGP, lot A-2418, purity 97.4% (VendorInvestigate).

🤝1🧊13
MM

slightly off topic but two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers

HL

for the archive i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier, not advice obviously

WT

blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs, ask me again in a month

HL

a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel

WT

genuine question verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted

WT

what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine

ZZ

do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones

transit-times.csv
560 rows · not retained in the public archive

is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation

📉4👍3

how does a supplier get verification revoked

HL

the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not

verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more