nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
#vendor-verification 2025-11-09
- taper_tess — update from 18 months ago: KP added evidence and the entry now reflects it 17:26
- taper_tess — update on the earlier thing how many independent results does a supplier need 17:28
- VialBot — Archive lookup: taper_tess first appears in this channel on 2025-08-17. 17:39
- lyophile_liv — verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted, take that with a pinch of salt 18:12
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
*Janoshik not the other one
does SGN being verified mean my vial is fine
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
revoked stays in the log
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
update from 18 months ago: KP added evidence and the entry now reflects it
update on the earlier thing how many independent results does a supplier need
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
pattern not one result
Archive lookup: taper_tess first appears in this channel on 2025-08-17.
coming back to this two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted, take that with a pinch of salt