we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
#vendor-verification 2025-10-16
- maintenance_mo — if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution 12:14
- tb500_tobias — is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log 12:20
- VialBot — Testing queue: 6 submissions open, 53 awaiting dispatch. 13:12
thats evidence
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
lot number or nothing
nothing gets deleted
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
does a good result from Janoshik outweigh a bad one from VendorInvestigate
pattern not one result
Testing queue: 6 submissions open, 53 awaiting dispatch.
both numbers go in
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel, i have it written down somewhere
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs