who decides, the mods or the room
#vendor-verification 2025-09-24
- VialBot — New independent result logged — WXT, lot B-0329, purity 99% (PeptideMeter). 22:31
- acetate_ash — two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers 22:47
- typosquat_tay — verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently, i could be wrong two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal.… 23:12
- VialBot — Channel stats, last 30 days: 74 messages from 47 members. 23:27
- impersonator_ip — verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted 23:39
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited, take that with a pinch of salt
ok so coming back after 12 months, has the standard changed
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
while im here if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution, i could be wrong
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log, anyway
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
New independent result logged — WXT, lot B-0329, purity 99% (PeptideMeter).
both numbers go in
never for sale
two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
thats evidence
how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently, i could be wrong
two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
Channel stats, last 30 days: 74 messages from 47 members.
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
log it either way