revoked stays in the log
#vendor-verification 2025-09-19
Friday23 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- question_queue — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises 18:11
- question_queue — verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted, still working it out 18:12
- VialBot — Verification log updated: CPC — evidence added, status unchanged. 18:19
- thirty_one_g — a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all 19:51
who decides, the mods or the room
both numbers go in
refresh on evidence
two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
never for sale
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted, still working it out
✅12👀2🙏6
slightly off topic but verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
Verification log updated: CPC — evidence added, status unchanged.
why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
pattern not one result
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
🙏10🔥1✅9
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
thin evidence
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division