revoked stays in the log
#vendor-verification 2025-08-24
Sunday18 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- lead_time_lars — we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern 10:19
- lead_time_lars — verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted 10:54
- plus_sixteen — is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable 12:06
- amylin_amy — update from 21 months ago: GL Biochem added evidence and the entry now reflects it 12:07
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
thats evidence
refresh on evidence
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
post the photos
📉1✅5
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
coa-a-2601.pdf
1 page · 178 KB · not retained in the public archive
both numbers go in
[edited]verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
❤️16✅1💀14
do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
log it either way
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
🙏9⚠️4
update from 21 months ago: GL Biochem added evidence and the entry now reflects it
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
thats not evidence
two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all, i have it written down somewhere