nothing gets deleted
[edited]#vendor-verification 2025-07-14
- triple_ag_tom — we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry 18:20
- triple_ag_tom — if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution, anyway 18:21
- triple_ag_tom — genuine question a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record 18:26
- month_six_me — update from 18 months ago: WWB added evidence and the entry now reflects it 19:12
- triple_ag_tom — the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who… 19:19
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution, anyway
| Evidence | Counts? |
|---|---|
| Independent report, lot you bought, lot number legible | yes |
| Independent report, no lot number | no |
| Supplier certificate only | no |
| Screenshot of a report | no |
| Blinded pooled submission | yes, for the pool |
| A friend who said it was fine | no |
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
genuine question a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
both numbers go in
right so nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes, from memory
lot number or nothing
update from 18 months ago: WWB added evidence and the entry now reflects it
[edited]blinded is better
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine