Inter-lab diff for lot A-2418: 99% vs 98.1%. Within expected range.
#vendor-verification 2025-05-02
Friday31 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- VialBot — Inter-lab diff for lot A-2418: 99% vs 98.1%. Within expected range. 19:49
- mcg_not_mg — verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently 20:45
- five_mg_ml — how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor 21:09
- five_mg_ml — a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both 21:13
log it either way
thin evidence
🧊10💀1❤️13
never for sale
refresh on evidence
unrelated but how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything
has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
genuine question i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
follow up what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
both numbers go in
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs, for what its worth
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
💀10🔥3⚠️8
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
[edited]a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
post the photos
how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
coa-b-0114.pdf
1 page · 676 KB · not retained in the public archive
pattern not one result
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
❤️11
revoked stays in the log
lot number or nothing
who decides, the mods or the room
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
update on the earlier thing somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log, someone check my working
how does a supplier get verification revoked
coming back after 4 months, has the standard changed
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
blinded is better
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division