update on the earlier thing what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
#vendor-verification 2025-04-23
- residual_solvent — update on the earlier thing what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine 17:47
- residual_solvent — coming back after 21 months, has the standard changed we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry 17:54
- residual_solvent — a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel 18:59
coming back after 21 months, has the standard changed
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises, we shall see
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
thats not evidence
[edited]a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
thin evidence
right so somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable