somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
#vendor-verification 2025-04-11
- lead_time_lars — verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more, from memory a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the… 17:11
- lead_time_lars — a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel 18:17
- VialBot — Reminder for egfr_ed: dose day is today. Set 8 days ago. 18:23
- egfr_ed — ok so the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division 18:48
thats not evidence
[edited]pattern not one result
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs, anyway
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
refresh on evidence
for the archive two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers, i think
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line, ymmv
both numbers go in
blinded is better
has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more, from memory
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
how does a supplier get verification revoked
nothing gets deleted
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
Reminder for egfr_ed: dose day is today. Set 8 days ago.
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
ok so the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division