two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
#vendor-verification 2025-04-08
Tuesday11 messages2 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- one_data_point — we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry 18:41
- subq_sy — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises 19:04
- one_data_point — verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more 19:06
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern, not advice obviously
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
blinded is better
pattern not one result
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
*PeptideMeter not the other one