vialroom

#vendor-verification 2025-03-19

Wednesday22 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • warsaw_vial — does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything 17:02
  • warsaw_vial — follow up a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited 17:58
  • warsaw_vial — verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted, from memory 17:59
WV

blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs

WV

does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything

EvidenceCounts?
Independent report, lot you bought, lot number legibleyes
Independent report, no lot numberno
Supplier certificate onlyno
Screenshot of a reportno
Blinded pooled submissionyes, for the pool
A friend who said it was fineno
MP

if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution

update from 10 months ago: QYB added evidence and the entry now reflects it, ill dig out the number

[edited]
HH

quick one two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers

HH

the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not

nothing gets deleted

WV

follow up a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited

🤝18❤️12

verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted, from memory

🤝12🎉2

a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both

thats not evidence

the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division

PP

we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry

WV

if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score

LM

somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log

LM

verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently

never for sale