while im here a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
#vendor-verification 2025-02-03
Monday19 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- food_noise_off — is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation 05:52
- never_for_sale — what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine 05:56
- never_for_sale — if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution, someone check my working 05:57
- food_noise_off — who decides, the mods or the room a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited 06:15
- batch_bandit — for the archive a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both 06:58
thin evidence
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
blinded is better
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
lot-log.csv
391 rows · not retained in the public archive
two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
📉3⚠️2👀2
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution, someone check my working
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
who decides, the mods or the room
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
both numbers go in
has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
not a recommendation
for the archive a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
💀15📈12
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record