vialroom

#vendor-verification 2025-01-26

Sunday19 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • dark_for_ten_days — does a good result from VendorInvestigate outweigh a bad one from VendorInvestigate 03:41
  • see_a_clinician — a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited 03:49
  • see_a_clinician — who decides, the mods or the room 04:51
HM

somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log

DF

if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution

DF

what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine

blinded is better

DF

update from 12 months ago: WWB added evidence and the entry now reflects it, not advice obviously

does a good result from VendorInvestigate outweigh a bad one from VendorInvestigate

⚠️12
SA

a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited

🙏14
HM

what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises, anyway

refresh on evidence

SA

a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all

has anyone ever offered to pay for verification