both numbers go in
#vendor-verification 2025-01-15
- reta_low_dose — why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes 17:24
- reta_low_dose — is there a version of the log i can read chronologically 17:31
- reta_low_dose — is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation 17:35
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
never for sale
revoked stays in the log
nothing gets deleted
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
post the photos
thats not evidence
*that should say weekly
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count