a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all, ill dig out the number
#vendor-verification 2024-12-08
Sunday11 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- identity_shift — a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record a supplier improving shows in the log as later… 14:05
- identity_shift — verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted, still working it out 14:46
- identity_shift — for the archive what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises 15:00
nothing gets deleted
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted, still working it out
not a recommendation
thin evidence
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
for the archive what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
📉1