vialroom

#vendor-verification 2024-11-08

Friday19 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • lot_number_lou — is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation 14:47
  • lot_number_lou — a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record 15:04
  • lot_number_lou — a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited 15:52
  • evidence_or_not — what actually counts as evidence for a verification 15:56
  • evidence_or_not — if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution 15:58

the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division

is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation

🔥10📈3
TE

a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all

the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not, thats just me

a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel

LN

a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record

verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted

i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count

LN

a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited

weights-monthly.csv
380 rows · not retained in the public archive

what actually counts as evidence for a verification

👍17

ok so who decides, the mods or the room

🙏2

if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution

EO

slightly off topic but two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log